MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025709527 · doi:10.1139/p10-095

First-principles calculations of intrinsic defects in the p-type semiconductor CuAlO<sub>2</sub>

2010· article· en· W2025709527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsConductivityPhysicsSemiconductorSupercellElectrical resistivity and conductivityCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyChemistryOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intrinsic defects, including vacancies at the Cu and Al sites (V Cu and V Al ), substitutional Cu at the Al site (Cu Al ), and interstitial O (O i ), have been proposed to be responsible for the p-type conductivity in CuAlO 2 . We have investigated the formation energies of these and other intrinsic defects in CuAlO 2 using GGA+U calculations. Our results support previous studies that the potential alignment and image charge correction are required in the calculation of defect formation energies by using the supercell approach. In CuAlO 2 , these p-type defects (V Cu , V Al , Cu Al , and O i ) invariably have lower formation energies than their n-type counterparts. Particularly, V Cu and Cu Al have the lowest formation energies among intrinsic defects, and therefore are most likely responsible for the p-type conductivity. However, the transition levels of the V Cu and Cu Al defects are deep, which are responsible for the poor p-type conductivity in CuAlO 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it