MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2025836502 · doi:10.1002/mrm.10041

Postacquisition suppression of large‐vessel BOLD signals in high‐resolution fMRI

2001· article· en· W2025836502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNuclear magnetic resonanceHigh resolutionFirst passComputer sciencePhysicsNeurosciencePsychologyMathematicsRemote sensingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-vessel BOLD contamination is a serious impediment to localization of neural activity in high-resolution fMRI studies. A new method is presented which estimates and removes the fraction of BOLD signal that arises from oriented vessels, such as cerebral and pial veins in a voxel, by measuring their influence on the phase angle of the complex valued fMRI time series. A maximum likelihood estimator based on a linear least-squares fit of the BOLD signal phase to the BOLD signal magnitude in a voxel is shown to efficiently suppress the BOLD effect from these larger veins, whose activation is not well colocalized with the neural response. In high-resolution in vivo fMRI data at 4 T, it is estimated that the method is sensitive to the phase changes in the cerebral, larger intracortical, and pial veins. The technique requires no special pulse sequence modifications or acquisition strategies, and is computationally fast and intrinsically robust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it