MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026182847 · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.012716

Fragmentation of condensed-phase DNA components by hyperthermal<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>impact

2006· article· lv· W2026182847 on OpenAlexafffund
Zongwu Deng, Marjorie Imhoff, Ilko Bald, Eugen Illenberger, Michael A. Huels

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsPhysicsThymineIonFragmentation (computing)Atomic physicsKinetic energyCrystallographyDNAChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have observed severe damage to films of DNA components (thymine, D-ribose, 2-deoxy-D-ribose, and thymidine) induced by $10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ ions $(2.5--25\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}∕\mathrm{amu})$. The damage is attributed to the kinetic and potential energies, as well as the chemical reactivity of the ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ projectiles. Hyperthermal ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ ion impact on these films results in the complete destruction of the molecules via fragmentation, and direct and indirect (secondary fragment) reactive scattering, all of which leads to the desorption of abundant cation and anion fragments. The chemical composition of the fragments is identified, and the fragmentation patterns are compared to those produced by ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{+}$ irradiation. While the lower mass of ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ ions causes less efficient desorption of very heavy fragments, several reactive collisions are also observed, including hydrogen abstraction by incident ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ from any of the molecules studied to yield desorbing $\mathrm{He}{\mathrm{H}}^{+}$. This process likely occurs via the formation of an intermediate molecular ion ${(\mathrm{He}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{H}\text{\ensuremath{-}}R)}^{*+}$, which decays to $\mathrm{He}{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{R}^{\ifmmode\bullet\else\textbullet\fi{}}$. Compared to ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{+}$, here a significant $(\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}23)$ enhancement in ${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$ desorption is observed during ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ ion irradiation, which likely involves (a) the decay of the intermediate ${(\mathrm{He}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{H}\text{\ensuremath{-}}R)}^{*+}$, or desorbing $\mathrm{He}{\mathrm{H}}^{+}$, and (b) Auger or quasiresonant excitations of C, N, or O atom centers (or C-H, N-H, or O-H bonds) by the incident ${\mathrm{He}}^{+}$ ion. The formation of several molecular cations, e.g., ${\mathrm{H}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}^{+}$, also requires hydrogen abstraction from its parent or adjacent molecules by initial cation fragments prior to desorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicIon-surface interactions and analysisFrench-language works237,207