MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026215755 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0301

Centrifuge modelling of heating effects on energy pile performance in saturated sand

2014· article· en· W2026215755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileCentrifugeGeotechnical engineeringSettlement (finance)Dynamic load testingHead (geology)Bearing capacityGeologyStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The operation of energy piles in summer can expel excess heat of the buildings into the ground by the use of a heat pump. Despite having been implemented for decades, the design of energy piles still relies heavily on empiricism, as there is limited understanding about heating effects on pile capacity. A series of centrifuge model tests on aluminum energy piles in medium dense saturated sand is reported in this study to investigate heating effects on the settlement patterns as well as capacities of single piles. In total, four in-flight pile load tests under three different temperatures, namely 22, 37, and 52 °C, and different loading sequences were carried out. Variations of pile capacity were interpreted with the help of a nonlinear elastic analysis. The test results show that after heating at zero applied axial load, toe resistance of the pile was mobilized as a result of constrained downward thermal expansion of the pile. Heating to a higher temperature caused the neutral plane to shift towards the pile toe due to a larger degree of mobilization of end-bearing resistance. It is also found that for a pile under a maintained working load, the pile head heaved initially by 1.4%D (D, pile diameter) when the temperature increased by 30 °C, but it gradually settled to 0.8%D after 4 months of continuous heating at the constant temperature. The post-pile settlement is believed to be caused by thermal contraction of sand. Subsequent pile load tests show that pile capacities increased by 13% and 30% with incremental temperatures of 15 and 30 °C, respectively. With an increasing temperature, shaft resistance increased but at a reducing rate. At a higher elevated temperature, toe resistance increased more rapidly than shaft resistance due to a larger downward expansion of the pile. For simplicity, earth pressure coefficients with values of 1.1K 0 and 1.3K 0 were found to be suitable for estimating the capacities of aluminum model piles with temperature increments of 15 and 30 °C, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it