MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026342410 · doi:10.1080/00288306.2004.9515049

U‐Pb geochronology and geochemistry of molybdenum‐bearing granodiorite porphyry at Copperstain Creek, west Nelson, New Zealand

2004· article· en· W2026342410 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyGeologyGeochemistryMolybdenumIsotope geochemistryIsotope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A molybdenite‐mineralised granodiorite porphyry at Copperstain Creek has a U‐Pb zircon age of 133.5 ± 0.2 Ma. This is older than the Early Cretaceous (126–105 Ma) Separation Point Suite, with which other molybdenum‐bearing granodiorite porphyries in west Nelson have been correlated on the basis of similar compositions and K‐Ar ages. The Copperstain Creek granodiorite differs compositionally from the high Na and Sr/Y rocks of the Separation Point Suite in having medium Na and low Sr/Y. Oxygen isotope δ 18 O magma values of ≤10‰ for the Copperstain Creek granodiorite and granites from the Separation Point Suite indicate that both are I‐type granites. However, the Copperstain Creek granodiorite porphyry has a minimum δ 18 O magma value of 9.4‰, which indicates a magma with a crustal component, whereas the Separation Point Suite granites have values (5.4–7.9‰) which are very primitive (“mantle‐like”). These new U‐Pb age and oxygen isotope data indicate that the Copperstain Creek granodiorite is not related to the Separation Point Suite granitoids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it