MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026673786 · doi:10.1115/1.3023141

Sampled-Data Stabilization of a Class of Nonlinear Systems With Application in Robotics

2009· article· en· W2026673786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationRoboticsA priori and a posterioriDiscretizationController (irrigation)Nonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Class (philosophy)Control engineeringLipschitz continuityComputer scienceSoftwareField (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsRobotEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The output feedback stabilization problem for the class of nonlinear Lipschitz systems is considered. A discrete-time feedback controller is designed for the sampled-data case, where the output of the plant is only available at discrete points of time and where the objective is to stabilize the system continuously using a discrete-time controller. We show that exact stabilization in this case can be achieved using a direct sampled-data design approach, based on H∞ optimization theory, in which neither the plant model nor the controller need to be discretized a priori. The proposed design is solvable using commercially available software and is shown to have important advantages over the classical emulation approach that has been used to solve similar problems. The applicability of the proposed techniques in the robotics field is thoroughly discussed from both the modeling and design perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it