Mesozoic fossil sustainability: synoptic case studies of resource management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fossils are a non-renewable natural resource that is not only important to science but also has immense value for education, tourism and commercial trade. Although the importance of sustainably managing exceptionally rich fossil localities is widely acknowledged, it is not universal and irreplaceable scientific information and socioeconomic benefits are being lost. This study provides an overview of the economic, social and environmental factors affecting 10 contrasting fossil localities in Germany, China, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and France that are significant for preserving the remains of Mesozoic vertebrates; these are amongst the most spectacular extinct animals and readily capture the public imagination. A discussion in the context of sustainable development is carried out. Non-extractive and scientific/educational (e.g. museums, geotourism) usage of fossil deposits are fully sustainable and benefit communities both economically and socially. Conversely, extractive uses (commercial collecting, quarrying) effect resource depletion but can be managed through scientific involvement, regulation and reinvestment of profits. Ultimately, implementation of an integrated approach embracing both profitable development and appropriate protection measures may ensure optimal usage of fossils for the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".