MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027029741 · doi:10.2307/3211210

Equity Issues in the Academy: An Afro-Canadian Woman's Perspective

2001· article· en· W2027029741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patience Elabor-Idemudia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Negro Education · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Equity (law)SociologyPsychologyGender studiesPolitical scienceArtVisual artsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equity Issues in the Academy: An Afro-- Canadian Woman's Perspective* This article contends that the Canadian academy' is perpetuated by the dominant staffing of teaching and administrative positions with White males; the Othering and marginalization of minorities, especially Black women; resistance to curricula and textbooks that reflect non-White experiences or values; and diminished expectations of minority students. Notwithstanding these shortcomings, the author asserts that the Canadian academy can become a site of empowerment and equity for all if it realistically confronts issues of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, class, age, religion, and ability, and challenges the core of privilege and power given to some and not to others in Canadian society. It is a strongly held conviction in Canada and other Western democracies that educational institutions play a central role in providing an environment that fosters the attainment of life opportunities for all students. The educational system is assumed to be the main instrument for acquiring the knowledge and skills that will ensure full participation and integration into Canadian society. However, a significant body of evidence demonstrates that the nation's educational institutions have preserved and perpetuated a system of structured inequality based on race, class, gender, sexuality, ability, age, and religious affiliation (Bannerji, 1991; Fleras, 1996; Henry, Tator, Mattis, & Rees, 2000; Ng, 1994). Through its institutions and systems of schooling, Canada has realized and maintained a reproduction of Anglo-dominated ideology and social order without much public awareness or open fanfare. Most Canadian educational administrators and decisionmakers are not even aware of the systemic bias inherent within their institutions, and even when they become aware, they most frequently deny or downplay the pervasiveness of such a bias. Studies by Allingham (1992) and Moodley (1992), for example, reveal that education in Canada historically has been inseparable from efforts to amalgamate non-Anglo (non-European) cultures into the Canadian mainstream. This conformist attitude sought to absorb diverse immigrant and non-White indigenous groups into Canadian society by stripping them of their languages and cultures. All aspects of Canadian schooling, from teachers and textbooks to policy and curriculum, were subsumed by the principles of Anglocentric or Eurocentric conformity. Initiatives that veered away from this framework were treated as irrelevant and dangerous. Special ethnic-focused curricula or calls for emphases on other languages and cultures were rejected as inconsistent with the educational needs of Canadian society. Today, the explicitly assimilationist model that once prevailed within Canadian educational circles is no longer officially endorsed. The new focus of education in Canada is increasingly to be responsive to diversity and to create a learning environment that acknowledges the cultures of all students (Henry, et al., 2000). Although these initiatives engage the rhetoric of cross-cultural communication, racial awareness and sensitivity, and healthy identity development, the widespread perception is that the Canadian academy is failing certain minorities and not providing them with a proper education. As Mukherjee (1993) has contended, this is because the tacit commitment to assimilation remains a central objective of that nation's educational system. This article maintains that from its daily routines to critical decision-making, the Canadian academy remains organized to facilitate cultural indoctrination and social control of its students and those working within it. This reproductive function is accomplished in a direct manner through the dominant staffing of teaching and administrative positions within the academy with White males, the resistance by academics to curricula and textbooks that reflect anything other than mainstream (White or Anglocentric) experiences or values, and White Canadian teachers' diminished expectations of minority students. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.1000.047
Scholarly communication0.0190.008
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0150.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Negro EducationSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207