MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027242504 · doi:10.1353/hph.2012.0034

Keeping the Journal Alive

2012· article· en· W2027242504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the history of philosophy · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingOrder (exchange)ClassicsPhilosophyLawHistorySociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keeping the Journal Alive David Fate Norton (bio) I have been asked to say a few words about the founding of the Journal of the History of Philosophy, to reflect on my editorship, and to comment on “how the Journal has developed and changed over the years.” I will have space to say very little about the last item, and so I have confined my essay to three sometimes overlapping parts: 1. The Founding of the Journal and its Early Years at the University of California, San Diego. 2. My Years as Executive Editor. 3. My Years as Editor. 1. The Founding of the Journal and Its Early Years at UCSD A detailed account of “the Founding of the Journal of the History of Philosophy” has been provided in Ed Strong’s article with exactly that title in JHP 25.1: 178–83.1 But some routinely overlooked details found in that article bear repeating here. The first Editors of the Journal were two Co-Editors, Wallace Matson of the University of California, Berkeley, and Richard H. Popkin, then at the Claremont Colleges. “Unfortunately,” Strong reported, “co-equal authority produced more conflict than concurrence in judging papers and in deciding on editorial policies and objectives.” In order to “escape from this impasse,” Benson Mates (also of UC Berkeley) was appointed Editor, and Popkin made Associate Editor. Near the end of 1962, “at Mates’ request, the roles were reversed and their names appeared in this order when the JHP began publishing in 1963” (JHP 25.1: 182–83).2 [End Page 153] In the fall of 1963, UCSD, previously devoted entirely to science and mathematics, welcomed the first of four humanities departments: History, Literature, Linguistics and Languages, and Philosophy. Richard Popkin, Chairman of the new Philosophy Department, had established the editorial office of the Journal within the precincts of his new department. For my part, during the previous two years I had taken four history of philosophy seminars with Popkin while completing an M.A. at Claremont Graduate School. At Popkin’s invitation, I moved to UCSD to do my Ph.D. Once there I was offered and quickly accepted a Research Assistantship associated with the Journal as an Editorial Assistant. I continued in this position through the end of 1964. In 1965, as the Journal expanded from a biannual to a quarterly, I became the first Assistant Editor in its short history. This position I held for six years, during one of which, 1966/67, I served as Acting Editor while Popkin was on sabbatical leave. 2. My Five Years as Executive Editor Unlike those who have been chosen as Journal Editors because they were well-established scholars, I think the record shows that I became Editor of the Journal in large part because of my experience with it. During the first two years of my move to McGill University (first, from January–April, 1971, and then permanently in January, 1972), I served as one of several Book Review Editors of the Journal. In 1973 I succeeded Mates as Associate Editor and was appointed to the Board of Directors. As a member of the Board I was present at the meeting during which Popkin requested that he be given, beginning in 1975, a leave of indeterminate length, and that during this leave an Executive Editor carry out the day-to-day work of editing the Journal. I was also present at the Board meeting during which the well-known scholar who had agreed to accept this position announced that he had changed his mind, that he would not accept the position of Executive Editor. Following this show-stopping announcement, seeing that both Popkin and the Journal were left in a difficult situation, I rashly offered to take on the role of Executive Editor. This offer was approved by the remaining Board members present. My offer was rash because, as is obvious, I had had no opportunity to prepare for support from McGill, and in the long run I was never able to gain from Mc-Gill adequate financial support for my work as Executive Editor or, later, Editor. Throughout its early years (indeed, as Popkin has pointed out, for something...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it