MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027583618 · doi:10.1159/000066507

Common Eye Diseases of Elderly People: Identifying and Treating Causes of Vision Loss

2002· review· en· W2027583618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacular degenerationMedicineVerteporfinImpaired VisionBlindnessDiabetic retinopathyElderly peopleGlaucomaOptometryOlder peopleRetinopathyVisual impairmentOphthalmologyGerontologyDiabetes mellitusChoroidal neovascularizationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of the 38 million people who are blind, the majority, 22 million, are 60 years of age or older. The most common causes of vision loss in elderly people are age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataract, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy. Of these, AMD is the leading cause of registered blindness in people over the age of 50 years in the western world. However, until recently, the treatment options for people with AMD have been severely limited. Verteporfin therapy is a new treatment that is efficacious and safe in selected patients with AMD who are at high risk of central vision loss. Physicians who are in regular contact with elderly people can help to minimize vision loss in this group of patients by being alert to the symptoms and signs of age-related eye diseases. This paper reviews each of the common eye diseases, with an emphasis on AMD because of the recent advances in treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it