MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027771689 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-07-04325-5

The kernels of radical homomorphisms and intersections of prime ideals

2007· article· en· W2027771689 on OpenAlexaff
Hung Viet Pham

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Leeds
KeywordsMathematicsHomomorphismPrime (order theory)Associated primePure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We establish a necessary condition for a commutative Banach algebra A A so that there exists a homomorphism θ \theta from A A into another Banach algebra such that the prime radical of the continuity ideal of θ \theta is not a finite intersection of prime ideals in A A . We prove that the prime radical of the continuity ideal of an epimorphism from A A onto another Banach algebra (or of a derivation from A A into a Banach A A -bimodule) is always a finite intersection of prime ideals. Under an additional cardinality condition (and assuming the Continuum Hypothesis), this necessary condition is proved to be sufficient. En route, we give a general result on norming commutative semiprime algebras; extending the class of algebras known to be normable. We characterize those locally compact metrizable spaces Ω \Omega for which there exists a homomorphism from C 0 ( Ω ) \mathcal C_0(\Omega ) into a radical Banach algebra whose kernel is not a finite intersection of prime ideals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207