MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027773142 · doi:10.1002/ppap.201100154

Vacuum‐ultraviolet (VUV) Photo‐polymerization of Amine‐rich Thin Films from Ammonia–Hydrocarbon Gas Mixtures

2012· article· en· W2027773142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerizationUltravioletHydrocarbonSolubilityMonomerPlasma polymerizationPolymerRadicalChemistryAmine gas treatingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)IrradiationNitrogenPhotochemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Photo‐induced polymerization of hydrocarbon “monomers”, both unsaturated C 2 H 4 and saturated CH 4 , has been carried out by vacuum‐ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation of the flowing gases at reduced pressure, employing near‐monochromatic radiation from Kr and Xe lamps. Using mixtures with NH 3 , the source of bound N in the coatings, similar concentrations, [N], can be achieved in both UV‐PE(M):N and low‐pressure plasma polymers, L‐PPE:N, but the former are much richer in primary amines, with selectivity values ([NH 2 ]/[N]) up to 75%. UV‐PE:N and UV‐PM:N films prepared with gas mixture ratios, R , between 0.75 and 1.0 possess the main characteristics required for bio‐technological applications: (i) NH 2 ‐rich, (ii) low loss of [NH 2 ] upon exposure to atmosphere or water, and (iii) very low solubility in aggressive solvents, e.g., water. The VUV photo‐polymerization process, governed by reactions of free radicals from the gas‐phase, appears to result in more stable, more densely cross‐linked deposits than those from plasma‐assisted processes. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it