Indentation behaviour and wear resistance of pseudoelastic Ti–Ni alloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies demonstrate that near equiatomic Ti–Ni alloys possess high resistance to surface damage by wear. It is suggested that the high wear resistance of Ti–Ni alloys is closely correlated to their pseudoelasticity, which is usually evaluated by tensile testing. However, when a Ti–Ni alloy is under wear, its surface is in a complex stress state. Since the thermoelastic martensitic transformation of Ti–Ni alloys responds differently to different stresses, it may not be appropriate to evaluate the pseudoelasticity by tensile testing. The present paper reports recent work on pseudoelastic behaviour of a Ti–51 at.-%Ni alloy employing a microindentation technique as well as tensile testing methods. In the present work, the wear performances of Ti–51 at.-%Ni alloy specimens with different degrees of pseudoelasticity were also investigated, and efforts were made to explain the beneficial effect of pseudoelasticity on the wear resistance of Ti–Ni alloys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it