MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028228347 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0001

A Very Peculiar Practice: The London Baseball League, 1906-1911

2006· article· en· W2028228347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueClubFootballExhibitionSuperstarWrightPopulationCornishHistoryMedia studiesAdvertisingEconomic historyArt historyManagementGeographySociologyDemographyArchaeologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Very Peculiar PracticeThe London Baseball League, 1906-1911 Daniel Bloyce (bio) Baseball has been played sporadically in England since a first exhibition tour in 1874, led by the former American professional Harry Wright and involving the great American pitcher, manager, and subsequent sporting goods tycoon Albert Goodwill Spalding. Although this particular tour had no real impact on the English public, a similar venture in 1889, this time led principally by Spalding, did spark a decade of development for baseball, which included numerous players among the indigenous population.1 The initial decision to develop baseball in England in 1890 was largely influenced by a number of Association Football clubs—based in the north and midlands of England—whose chairmen were looking for ways to generate income during the close, summer season. The league and cup competitions that were set up during this time enjoyed fleeting success. The most famous team of that era, the Derby Baseball Club, regularly attracted thousands of spectators, and the ground where the team played became known as "The Baseball Ground"—a site where Derby County football club played for almost a hundred years. Despite the fleeting success of these developments, the English press were rarely supportive. In fact, when they showed any interest whatsoever, it was normally to pour scorn on the developments taking place. Baseball was regarded as a poor man's cricket and was considered a form of "glorified rounders."2 Another issue facing those who wished to promote the game was that throughout much of this decade of development, only a handful of the clubs that were set up were based in London. London, of course, was the major metropolis, and where any American businessman residing in the country at that time was likely to have set up home. So London was regarded as an essential location for baseball to be considered a success. Some London-based teams were established, but these were mostly American-led initiatives. The league that was established folded in 1901, without so much as a word written in the press of its demise. [End Page 118] This essay will focus on the next development that took place while seeking to establish baseball in England. What makes this period so interesting, aside from the fact that nobody has written about it before, is that the developments were entirely based in London; that the by now very successful Football League clubs based there were chiefly responsible for its development; and that, to begin with at least, the major proponents of the game were from the indigenous population. However, despite this, baseball still received next to no coverage in the national press, and only sporadic, yet occasionally supportive, coverage in the local, London-based newspapers. Generate Income On April 9, 1906, the British Baseball Association (BBA) was established during a meeting at the Charterhouse Hotel, London. The London Times, reporting on baseball for the first time in over a decade, reported that the development of the BBA "was supported by delegates from the Millwall, Crystal Palace, Tottenham Hotspur, Clapton Orient, Woolwich Arsenal, Fulham, Leyton, West Ham, and Chelsea [football] Clubs."3 At this meeting it was proposed that a league, based in London, should be formed.4 The drive from these football clubs mirrored that of those who were responsible for developing baseball in the 1890s.5 Again clubs were seeking to generate income in the close season. For instance, the Directors' Report for Woolwich Arsenal Football Club expresses this concern: "The directors have long felt that your football ground should be utilized as far as possible during the "close season," and an endeavour is being made this summer, in conjunction with other football clubs in London, to introduce the game of baseball as a summer attraction."6 Only Clapton Orient, Fulham, Leyton, Tottenham Hotspur and Woolwich Arsenal actually took part in the first season. Brentford and Millwall football clubs also had teams—though they were not organized in time to play league matches.7 It is not known why, but Chelsea and West Ham appear not to have established baseball teams. The Nondescripts baseball club, who played in Canning Town, was also created "as a result of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it