MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028228347 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0001

A Very Peculiar Practice: The London Baseball League, 1906-1911

2006· article· en· W2028228347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Bloyce

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueClubFootballExhibitionSuperstarWrightPopulationCornishHistoryMedia studiesAdvertisingEconomic historyArt historyManagementGeographySociologyDemographyArchaeologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Very Peculiar PracticeThe London Baseball League, 1906-1911 Daniel Bloyce (bio) Baseball has been played sporadically in England since a first exhibition tour in 1874, led by the former American professional Harry Wright and involving the great American pitcher, manager, and subsequent sporting goods tycoon Albert Goodwill Spalding. Although this particular tour had no real impact on the English public, a similar venture in 1889, this time led principally by Spalding, did spark a decade of development for baseball, which included numerous players among the indigenous population.1 The initial decision to develop baseball in England in 1890 was largely influenced by a number of Association Football clubs—based in the north and midlands of England—whose chairmen were looking for ways to generate income during the close, summer season. The league and cup competitions that were set up during this time enjoyed fleeting success. The most famous team of that era, the Derby Baseball Club, regularly attracted thousands of spectators, and the ground where the team played became known as "The Baseball Ground"—a site where Derby County football club played for almost a hundred years. Despite the fleeting success of these developments, the English press were rarely supportive. In fact, when they showed any interest whatsoever, it was normally to pour scorn on the developments taking place. Baseball was regarded as a poor man's cricket and was considered a form of "glorified rounders."2 Another issue facing those who wished to promote the game was that throughout much of this decade of development, only a handful of the clubs that were set up were based in London. London, of course, was the major metropolis, and where any American businessman residing in the country at that time was likely to have set up home. So London was regarded as an essential location for baseball to be considered a success. Some London-based teams were established, but these were mostly American-led initiatives. The league that was established folded in 1901, without so much as a word written in the press of its demise. [End Page 118] This essay will focus on the next development that took place while seeking to establish baseball in England. What makes this period so interesting, aside from the fact that nobody has written about it before, is that the developments were entirely based in London; that the by now very successful Football League clubs based there were chiefly responsible for its development; and that, to begin with at least, the major proponents of the game were from the indigenous population. However, despite this, baseball still received next to no coverage in the national press, and only sporadic, yet occasionally supportive, coverage in the local, London-based newspapers. Generate Income On April 9, 1906, the British Baseball Association (BBA) was established during a meeting at the Charterhouse Hotel, London. The London Times, reporting on baseball for the first time in over a decade, reported that the development of the BBA "was supported by delegates from the Millwall, Crystal Palace, Tottenham Hotspur, Clapton Orient, Woolwich Arsenal, Fulham, Leyton, West Ham, and Chelsea [football] Clubs."3 At this meeting it was proposed that a league, based in London, should be formed.4 The drive from these football clubs mirrored that of those who were responsible for developing baseball in the 1890s.5 Again clubs were seeking to generate income in the close season. For instance, the Directors' Report for Woolwich Arsenal Football Club expresses this concern: "The directors have long felt that your football ground should be utilized as far as possible during the "close season," and an endeavour is being made this summer, in conjunction with other football clubs in London, to introduce the game of baseball as a summer attraction."6 Only Clapton Orient, Fulham, Leyton, Tottenham Hotspur and Woolwich Arsenal actually took part in the first season. Brentford and Millwall football clubs also had teams—though they were not organized in time to play league matches.7 It is not known why, but Chelsea and West Ham appear not to have established baseball teams. The Nondescripts baseball club, who played in Canning Town, was also created "as a result of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207