MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W20284745 · doi:10.1177/082585970602200203

Living in a World without Closure: Reality for Parents who have Experienced the Death of a Child

2006· article· en· W20284745 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palliative Care · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosure (psychology)PsychologyMedicineNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The death of a child has been described as being for parents one of the most traumatic of losses. Nevertheless, information about how parents experience transition through the death trajectory is lacking. This phenomenological study explored parents' lived experienced of transitioning through the death of a child. Twenty-eight bereaved parents (17 mothers, 11 fathers) took part in retrospective, open-ended interviews. Findings showed that, regardless of the time, parents continued to live in a world without closure and, more importantly, did not want to experience closure in their transitioning. To parents, "closure" meant an end to their child in every sense of the word. Their experience of living in a world without closure was supported by four themes: "keeping the memories alive", "being a good parent", "being there at my child's death", and "being there for me after my child dies". Findings yield new insights into how parents live with the death of a child.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it