MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028521711 · doi:10.1109/cicybs.2014.7013367

Supervised learning to detect DDoS attacks

2014· article· en· W2028521711 on OpenAlexafffund
Eray Balkanli, Jander Alves, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Institute for Materials ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsComputer scienceMachine learningDecision treeArtificial intelligenceNaive Bayes classifierDenial-of-service attackIntrusion detection systemSupervised learningFeature (linguistics)Random forestOpen sourceSupport vector machineThe InternetArtificial neural networkWorld Wide WebSoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, we explore the performances of two supervised learning techniques and two open-source network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) on backscatter darknet traffic. We employ Bro and Corsaro open-source systems as well as the CART Decision Tree and Naive Bayes machine learning classifiers. While designing our machine learning classifiers, we used different sizes of training/test sets and different feature sets to understand the importance of data pre-processing. Our results show that a machine learning base approach can achieve very high performance on such backscatter darknet traffic without using IP addresses and port numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207