The Relationship between Water Wetting and Ice Adhesion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ice accretion on aircraft leads to difficulties in aircraft flight control due to weight increase and change in weight distribution. Conventionally these difficulties are overcome using anti-icing or de-icing products, such as freezing depressants and heating devices. A more cost effective way to solve these problems would be to use ice repellent surfaces (ice-phobic). As a first step in this direction the relationship between water wettability and ice adhesion was investigated. Using the appropriate chemistry and tailoring the surface roughness a variety of polycarbonate-coated surfaces were created: these included ultra-hydrophilic and ultra-hydrophobic surfaces and surfaces with surface properties in between the extreme ultra-surfaces. Ice adhesion tests and contact angle measurements indicated that the higher the contact angle the lower is the adhesion of ice. The best results were obtained in the case of ultra-hydrophobic surface treatment that led to an 18 fold decrease in ice adhesion compared to the untreated aluminum surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it