MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028800232 · doi:10.2118/05-09-03

A Fractal Wormhole Model for Cold Heavy Oil Production

2005· article· en· W2028800232 on OpenAlexafffundabout
X. Liu, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
KeywordsWormholeFractalStatistical physicsDissolutionPetroleum engineeringDiffusionProduction (economics)Porous mediumMechanicsPorosityGeologyPhysicsGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsEngineeringTheoretical physicsThermodynamicsChemical engineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wormholes are believed to be generated during the process of cold production and are responsible for enhanced production rates. Understanding the wormhole patterns generated inside the reservoir formation is critical to improve the recovery efficiency and to model the fluid flow behaviour in the cold production process. In this paper, we have proposed that the wormhole growth can be described by the Diffusion-Limited Aggregation (DLA) model, which naturally relates to a broad variety of branchinggrowth patterns through the physics of the processes. The physical processes that were described using fractal models include the following: the growth of a drainage network; the formation of cavities; the dissolution of porous materials; and, the growth of random dendrites in the thin films. The DLA model has important implications in petroleum geology and engineering. Based on the experimental results published in the literature, which were specifically designed to investigate the wormhole dynamics by a Computed-Tomography X-Ray scanner, the wormhole diameter distribution along the wormhole path has been analyzed using the Area Version of Gaussian Function. Then, the material balance method has been applied to the sand production data to determine the possible range of the wormhole structure around the wellbore, assuming that the sand particles are solely produced along the paths of wormholes. Finally, a numerical method has been developed to analyze the field sand production data. The studies have shown that the fractal wormhole model can be used to diagnose the characteristics of the wormhole structures, and that it can be applied to optimize well placement in cold heavy oil production. The model will greatly enhance the analyses of the inflow performance and the pressure response of wells in wormholed reservoirs. Results acquired from this study can also be implemented in field scale numerical simulations for the cold flow process. Introduction Cold production is a non-thermal process in which sand is aggressively produced to reach a higher oil production rate. In the cold flow process, sand and oil are produced together under primary conditions and oil production rates can typically increase by a factor of 10 or more(1–5). For example, primary oil production rates of 8 – 12 m3/d are roughly 10 times greater than those calculated for the radial flow in the Celtic field using Darcy's law(2). The unusual sand production in cold production was observed in several oil fields. Records have indicated that the production of about 708 m3 of sand in the first four months, and in nearly all the wells in S.E. Pauls Valley Field, Oklahoma, produced 10 – 50% sand initially, declining a few months later to 0.1 – 2%, regardless of completion method(5). The cumulative gross fluid production of about 9,000 m3 with an associated sand production of 200 m3 within a period of 1,000 days was observed in the Lindbergh and Frog Lake Fields, Alberta(1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207