MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028918340 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta:20060413

Exact discretisation of a scalar differential Riccati equation with constant parameters

2007· article· en· W2028918340 on OpenAlexaff
N. Hori, C.A. Rabbath, P.N. Nikiforuk

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanDefence Research and Development Canada
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsDiscretizationRiccati equationMathematicsDifferential equationConstant (computer programming)Algebraic Riccati equationNonlinear systemScalar (mathematics)Exact differential equationControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsSampling (signal processing)Linear differential equationComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An exact, first-order, discrete-time model that gives correct values at the sampling instants for any sampling interval is derived for a nonlinear system whose dynamics are governed by a scalar Riccati differential equation with constant parameters. The model is derived by transforming the given differential equation into a stable linear form to which the invariant discretisation is applied. This is in contrast with other existing methods which result in a second-order and usually unstable form and which is not suitable for on-line digital control purposes. Simulation results are presented to show that the proposed method is always exact at the sampling instants, whereas the popular forward difference model can be divergent unless the sampling interval is sufficiently small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Control Theory and ApplicationsSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207