Monotonicity-Based Fast Algorithms for MAP Estimation of Markov Sequences Over Noisy Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this correspondence, we study algorithmic approach to solving the problem of maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of Markov sequences transmitted over noisy channels, which is also known as the MAP decoding problem. For the class of memoryless binary channels that produce independent substitution and erasure errors, the MAP sequence estimation problem can be formulated and solved as one of the longest path in a weighted directed acyclic graph. But for algorithm efficiency, we transform the graph problem to one of matrix search. If the underlying matrix is totally monotone, then the complexity of MAP sequence estimation can be greatly reduced. We give a sufficient condition for the matrix induced by MAP sequence estimation to be totally monotone, which is indeed the case if the input sequence is Gaussian Markov. Under this condition, the complexity of MAP decoding can be reduced from O(N/sup 2/M) to O(NM), where N is the size of source alphabet and M is the length of input sequence. Furthermore, for Markov sequences of fixed-length code we propose a block parsing strategy to reduce the complexity of MAP sequence estimation to O(M+N/sup 2/M/logM) or to O(M+NM/logM), depending on if the total monotonicity holds. Another significance of this correspondence lies in the applicability of the presented algorithmic approach, which has been thoroughly studied in computer science literature, to many other discrete optimization problems encountered in both source and channel coding, ranging from optimal multiresolution and multiple-description quantizer design, to context quantization for minimum conditional entropy, and to optimal packetization with uneven error protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".