MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029330442 · doi:10.1353/mgs.0.0078

Why Read Kazantzakis in the Twenty-first Century?

2010· article· en· W2029330442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of modern Greek studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophical Thought and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorCivilizationClassicsGeorge (robot)HistoryLawLibrary scienceMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why Read Kazantzakis in the Twenty-first Century? Peter Bien, Guest Editor Nikos Kazantzakis died in 1957 and 50 years later his achievements were celebrated world-wide. When George Stassinakis, president of The International Society of Friends of Nikos Kazantzakis, based in Geneva, urged me to set up a celebration in the United States, I was able to do this at New York University thanks to the splendid cooperation of Katherine Fleming, the Alexander S. Onassis Professor of Hellenic Culture and Civilization there, who offered a venue plus lunch, dinner, and secretarial assistance. Financial help came as well from Katy Myrivili in Athens, who was able to secure reimbursement for our symposiasts' travel expenses. Professor Nikos Metallinos of the Department of Communication Studies, Concordia University, Montreal, a specialist in Kazantzakis and music, served with vigor as vice-chairman of the event. Our chief sponsor was the Hellenic Foundation for Culture, Athens; co-sponsors were the International Society of the Friends of Nikos Kazantzakis, the National Book Center (EKEBI) in Athens, the Greek Embassy in Washington, and New York City's Greek Consulate, whose consul-general made a courteous appearance. We are grateful to all the individuals and organizations who helped make this conference a success. And we are particularly grateful to the Greek Embassy for generously providing funds to subsidize the publication of these papers here. The symposium was held at New York University in March of 2007, entitled, "Why Should We Read Kazantzakis in the Twenty-first Century?" to honor Kazantzakis on the fiftieth anniversary of his death. We met for a very long day on 3 March 2007 from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at NYU's Jurow Hall, finishing with a performance by Lina Orfanos and Spiros Exaras of songs from Theodorakis's Zorba ballet, and then a lovely, leisurely supper. Also, as a welcome diversion in mid-afternoon, the symposiasts enjoyed a stirring dramatic reading by Yannis Simonides from Kazantzakis's play Kapodistrias. [End Page 1] Thirteen papers were delivered by scholars ranging from retired senior professors to a schoolteacher and a current graduate student, folks who came from as far away as Greece, Texas, Florida, Michigan, California, and from as close as Broadway and 116th Street. Expanded versions of 11 of the original 13 presentations are printed herein, all of them edited by Katherine Fleming and myself; in addition, we include studies by Michael Paschalis and Ben Petre that were not delivered at the symposium. All address, in one way or another, the title question of the symposium: Why should we read Kazantzakis in the twenty-first century? I opened the proceedings with a short introductory talk on Kazantzakis's future reputation—whether he would still be read 100 years from now. It is very hard to tell. I attempted to examine causes of his initial popularity and then to predict some reasons that might account for his renewed popularity in the future. Sometimes a popular author falls into relative obscurity and is then revived, Joseph Conrad being a good example. Kazantzakis, too, all the rage in the 1960s, failed to catch on afterwards. But his star seems to be rising again as the twenty-first century progresses. I surmised that he may be valued in the future primarily as a sort of cosmological visionary teaching us, through literary means, to love transience because it's all there is, and we are part of it. If Kazantzakis is read 100 years in the future, it may be as a very interesting religious thinker. A favorite religious philosopher of mine, Don Cupitt, formulates the possible reasons as follows: … [L]ike Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, and Unamuno—[Kazantzakis] is one of those representative figures who has struggled on our behalf to make sense out of the many conflicting strands in modern Western culture…. He is highly aware of the contrast between the compassionate religious humanism of the New Testament … and the heroic humanism of Homer: Jesus versus Odysseus. And Kazantzakis is just as vividly aware of the conflict between the timeless … idea of truth taught by Plato and the Greek Church, and the historically evolving picture of reality that underlies all modern culture since Hegel...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it