A closer look at United States and global surface temperature change
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
We compare the United States and global surface air temperature changes of the past century using the current Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) analysis and the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) record [ Karl et al. , 1990]. Changes in the GISS analysis subsequent to the documentation by Hansen et al . [1999] are as follows: (1) incorporation of corrections for time‐of‐observation bias and station history adjustments in the United States based on Easterling et al . [1996a], (2) reclassification of rural, small‐town, and urban stations in the United States, southern Canada, and northern Mexico based on satellite measurements of night light intensity [ Imhoff et al. , 1997], and (3) a more flexible urban adjustment than that employed by Hansen et al . [1999], including reliance on only unlit stations in the United States and rural stations in the rest of the world for determining long‐term trends. We find evidence of local human effects (“urban warming”) even in suburban and small‐town surface air temperature records, but the effect is modest in magnitude and conceivably could be an artifact of inhomogeneities in the station records. We suggest further studies, including more complete satellite night light analyses, which may clarify the potential urban effect. There are inherent uncertainties in the long‐term temperature change at least of the order of 0.1°C for both the U.S. mean and the global mean. Nevertheless, it is clear that the post‐1930s cooling was much larger in the United States than in the global mean. The U.S. mean temperature has now reached a level comparable to that of the 1930s, while the global temperature is now far above the levels earlier in the century. The successive periods of global warming (1900–1940), cooling (1940–1965), and warming (1965–2000) in the 20th century show distinctive patterns of temperature change suggestive of roles for both climate forcings and dynamical variability. The U.S. was warm in 2000 but cooler than the warmest years in the 1930s and 1990s. Global temperature was moderately high in 2000 despite a lingering La Niña in the Pacific Ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
- Topic
- Climate variability and models
- Field
- Environmental Science
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- GeographyClimatologyGlobal changeMagnitude (astronomy)SatelliteEnvironmental scienceClimate changeMeteorologyGeologyPhysicsOceanography
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes