La transparence : obsession et métamorphose
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chaque époque est habitée par des métaphores caractéristiques qui en expriment les lignes de force. La transparence est incontestablement l’une d’elles aujourd’hui. On la retrouve en effet aussi bien en esthétique industrielle (« coquilles » transparentes des ordinateurs et autres objets technologiques) qu’en droit (obsession de la transparence des machines abstraites, suspicion du secret), et elle traverse tout autant l’architecture (utilisation du verre, expulsion des organes internes du bâtiment à l’extérieur) que l’économie (théorie de la transparence des marchés), voire la philosophie (éthique de la communication, chez Habermas par exemple). Cet article entend rechercher ce que signifie cette métaphore de la transparence au travers de ses multiples occurrences et de souligner quelques points de rencontre possible avec la pensée d’Henri Bergson.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it