MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029787843 · doi:10.1145/2160803.2160823

Tracking adaptive performance models using dynamic clustering of user classes (abstracts only)

2011· article· en· W2029787843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCarleton UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceEstimatorData miningTracking (education)Class (philosophy)Filter (signal processing)SoftwareArtificial intelligenceMachine learningReal-time computingComputer visionMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimation techniques have been largely applied to track hidden performance parameters (e.g. service demands) of web based software systems. In this paper we investigate dynamic multiclass modeling of such systems, with variable classes of service, aiming at finding a low complexity model yet with enough accuracy. We propose a combination of clustering algorithm and tracking filter for effective grouping of classes of services. The tracking estimator is based on a layered queuing model with parameters for CPU demands and the user load intensity of each class of service. Clustering uses the K-means algorithm. The target application is autonomic control of web clusters, where changes occur at different rates and amplitudes and at random time instants. Experiments show that the tracking is effective, and reveal good filter settings for different variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it