MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030702779 · doi:10.1117/12.892379

Predictive video decoding using GME and motion reliability

2011· article· en· W2030702779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionMotion (physics)Frame (networking)Motion estimationQuarter-pixel motionReference frameMotion fieldBlock-matching algorithmAlgorithmVideo processingVideo trackingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an improved approach to predictive video decoding based on global and local motion reliability. The framework consists of three processing stages. Global motion (GM) estimation and motion reliability analysis are the key components in the first stage, where we model global motion and refine the MV field. In the second stage, we predict local and global motion for the target frame, and determine corresponding weights based on the Linear Minimum Mean Square Error (LMMSE) criterion. Finally in the third stage, a temporal interpolator is applied to compose two future frames, which are linearly combined to form the final predicted frame. Our results indicate the proposed method achieves better visual quality compare to other state-of-the-art predictive decoding approaches, particularly in sequences involving moving camera and objects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it