Report on a 5-Year Follow-Up of a Case of Severe Hoarding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hoarding behavior has been reported as occurring both within and independently of obsessive— compulsive disorder (OCD). It is characterized by the acquisition of possessions of limited value or utility, accompanied by a failure to discard those same possessions, and it can result in mild to severe impairment; appears to follow a chronic, progressive course; and has traditionally been seen as largely treatment refractory, with impaired motivation for treatment cited as a major factor. Theoretical models have proposed information-processing deficits, distorted beliefs and cognitions, and excessive attachment to objects. This article reports a 5-year follow-up of a case of chronic, progressive hoarding behavior, co-occurring with OCD and impulse control disorder. It describes the attempted treatment modalities and their long-term results. It may be of specific interest to clinicians as the client is unique in her ability to articulate cognitions and emotion with regard to the hoarding behavior. Motivational factors are highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it