MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031580796 · doi:10.4310/cms.2004.v2.n1.a4

Conservative multigrid methods for ternary Cahn-Hilliard systems

2004· article· en· W2031580796 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Mathematical Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCahn–Hilliard equationDiscretizationMultigrid methodConvergence (economics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsNonlinear systemTernary operationStability (learning theory)Constraint (computer-aided design)Work (physics)Extension (predicate logic)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisPartial differential equationGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a conservative, second order accurate fully implicit discretization of ternary (three-phase) Cahn-Hilliard (CH) systems that has an associated discrete energy functional. This is an extension of our work for two-phase systems We analyze and prove convergence of the scheme. To efficiently solve the discrete system at the implicit time-level, we use a nonlinear multigrid method. The resulting scheme is efficient, robust and there is at most a 1 st order time step constraint for stability. We demonstrate convergence of our scheme numerically and we present several simulations of phase transitions in ternary systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it