MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031663903 · doi:10.1145/1345206.1345222

A case study in SIMD text processing with parallel bit streams

2008· article· en· W2031663903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSIMDByteParallel computingTranscodingStream processingSearch engine indexingDecoding methodsBitstreamAlgorithmComputer hardwareArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High performance SIMD text processing using the method of parallel bit streams is introduced with a case study of UTF-8 to UTF-16 transcoding. A forward transform converts byte-oriented character stream data into eight parallel bit streams. Decoding, validation and computation of UTF-8 indexed UTF-16 bit streams are performed using bit-parallel logic and shifting operations. Conversion from UTF-8 indexing to UTF-16 indexing is performed using parallel bit deletion. The inverse transform is applied to yield high and low UTF-16 byte streams which are then merged. Combined with optimization techniques for blocks of ASCII data, speed-ups of 3 to 25 times are achieved on commodity processors compared with optimized byte-at-a-time code. Further applications of the method of parallel bit streams to bulk text processing applications are briefly discussed along with future prospects for the combination of intraregister and intrachip parallelism on multicore processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207