MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032042695 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2014.2311696

Improved Cross-Polarization Performance of a Multi-Phase-Center Parabolic Reflector Antenna

2014· article· en· W2032042695 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase centerCassegrain antennaOffset dish antennaOpticsPolarization (electrochemistry)Feed hornOffset (computer science)Parabolic antennaMulti-mode optical fiberPhysicsCenter frequencyPeriscope antennaAntenna measurementAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsComputer scienceOptical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter addresses the cross-polarization properties of electronically controlled multi-phase-center parabolic reflector antennas, illuminated by over-moded primary feeds. Due to the presence of the higher-order modes in the primary feed, the secondary cross-polarization levels deteriorate in the case of symmetric reflector antennas. As for the offset reflectors, the primary multimode feed required to displace the phase-center location may produce a significant crosstalk in the orthogonal polarization. It is shown how one can improve the cross-polarization performances of aforementioned adaptive antennas, which are capable of providing axial beams while their phase-center locations are displaced. The conventional array technique with a simple signal processing is used for the symmetric case, whereas a trimode primary feed is employed for the offset case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it