DNA integrity and transgene expression after passage through the NOGA needle catheter used for therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The NOGA (Biosense Webster, Markham, ON, Canada) injection catheter is an innovative navigational device that provides an ideal platform for intra-myocardial injection material. However, injection through a long (1.91 m), narrow (27G) nitinol needle could result in deterioration in the integrity and functionality of DNA. METHODS: To test this possibility, DNA in plasmid form (pcDNA3.1) containing the Lac Z transgene (250 micro l) was passed through the NOGA needle using a hand-held 1 cc syringe at a gentle hand injection pressure (43 +/- 3 PSI, 3.0 +/- 0.2 kg/cm(2)) or at maximal manual pressure (90 +/- 6 PSI, 6.3 +/- 0.4 kg/cm(2)), either once or 20 times. This DNA, compared to DNA not passed through the NOGA needle (control), was then used to transfect primary cultures of rat skin fibroblasts (FB) from Fisher 344 rats and the cells were subsequently stained for beta galactosidase (betagal). RESULTS: Transfection efficiency was significantly reduced by passing the DNA through the needle at both 43 +/- 3 PSI (78 +/- 4% of control, n = 10, P < 0.05 versus control) and 90 +/- 6 PSI (66 +/- 4 % of control, n = 10, P < 0.01 versus control, P < 0.02 versus 43 +/- 3 PSI). Passage of the DNA through the NOGA needle 20 times resulted in a transfection efficiency of only 5 +/- 1% of control (n = 20, P < 0.1 x 10(-11) versus control). Capillary Electrophoresis revealed that the reduction in transfection efficiency was due to a conformational change in the DNA from predominantly supercoiled to nicked and linearized DNA. Transfection efficiency as compared with control decreased as the concentration of the DNA solution which was passed through the needle was increased from 0.3 micro g/ micro l to 2.4 micro g/ micro l. Recovery experiments confirmed that the reduction in transfection efficiency was not due to loss of DNA by binding to the NOGA needle. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DNA is susceptible to shear forces when injected through the NOGA needle even at nominal clinical injection pressures, suggesting that careful and controlled injections will be required to achieve optimal gene integrity and expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".