MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032062020 · doi:10.4141/p02-127

Corn heat unit variability and potential of corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production in a cool climate ecosystem

2003· article· en· W2032062020 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
A. B. Kwabiah, Murdo MacPherson, D. B. McKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsFrost (temperature)Zea maysSilageAgronomyForageGenetically modified maizeEnvironmental scienceAnimal scienceBiologyGeographyGenetically modified cropsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent interest in corn (Zea mays L.) production among forage producers in Newfoundland, Canada, raises questions of risk, scale and impact of seasonal heat accumulation for attaining maturity. The objectives of this paper were to present the results of corn performance in a short-term trial at three selected sites (St. John’s, Deer Lake and Stephenville), calculate corn heat unit (CHU) probability levels of these sites to assess the long-term risks, and determine CHU values of locations across Newfoundland to describe their suitability for corn production. Daily values of CHU were accumulated from the conversion of daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) air temperature for each location using the last day of 3 consecutive days in the spring with mean daily air temperatures (Tmean) ≥ 12.8°C as the starting date and the first date of a killing frost in the autumn (Tmin ≤ -2°C) or 30 September, whichever was earlier, as the ending date. Corn grown for silage at the three selected sites was within the desired level of 250–350 g kg-1 DM at 50% kernel milk line (R5.5) stage. Corn reached harvesting stage (R5.5) before the occurrence of a killing frost at Deer Lake and Stephenville. To protect seedlings against killing frost, mulching with transparent polyethylene film is recommended at St. John ’s. There was considerable year-to-year variability in CHU at each of the three sites. Differences in seasonal CHU for St. John’s were identified over two periods: from 1945–1989 and 1990–2001. The most recent period (1990–2001) has generally been warmer than the earlier period. A warming trend, as indicated by the CHU trends at the three sites, holds the prospect of some significant longer-term benefits for Newfoundland agriculture. Across Newfoundland, average (1956–1990) seasonal CHU accumulations (CHUave) based on STARTave and ENDend) ranged from 1686 at St. Lawrence to 2695 at Gander. Using the 80% probability (START80% and END80%) dates, the CHU80% ranged from 1486 at Port aux Basques to 2382 at Gander. The CHU values would help producers select what corn hybrid(s) to grow in their area. Overall, these analyses underline the potential for successful corn production in Newfoundland. Key words: Corn (Zea mays L.) maturity, corn heat units, cool climate region, 50% kernel milk line (R5.5), temperature

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207