MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying valence structure in LiFeAs and NaFeAs with core-level spectroscopy

2009· article· en· W2032127614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperconductivityResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringValence (chemistry)Spectral lineElectronic structureExcited stateSpectroscopyCondensed matter physicsFermi levelScatteringMaterials scienceDensity of statesDensity functional theoryAtomic physicsInelastic neutron scatteringPhysicsInelastic scatteringElectronNuclear physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resonant x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) measurements at Fe L(2,3) edges and electronic structure calculations for LiFeAs and NaFeAs are presented. Experiment and theory show that in the vicinity of the Fermi energy, the density of states is dominated by contributions from Fe 3d states. The comparison of Fe L(2,3) XES with spectra of related FeAs compounds reveals similar trends in energy and the ratio of intensities of the L(2) and L(3) peaks (I(L(2))/I(L(3)) ratio). The I(L(2))/I(L(3)) ratio for all FeAs-based superconductors is found to be closer to that of metallic Fe than that of the strongly correlated FeO. We conclude that iron-based superconductors are weakly or, at most, moderately correlated systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it