Statistics and Parameterizations of the Effect of Turbulence on the Geometric Collision Kernel of Cloud Droplets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Collision statistics of cloud droplets in turbulent flow have been calculated for 12 droplet size combinations in four flow fields with levels of the eddy dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy ranging from 95 to 1535 cm2 s−3. The flow fields were generated by using a direct numerical simulation technique and large numbers of droplets were explicitly tracked through the flow field for each experiment. The effect of turbulence on the collision kernel increases with both increasing radius ratio and eddy dissipation rate. These increases range from fairly modest values to almost 10 times the gravitational geometric collision kernel. The two physical processes responsible for these increases are the radial relative velocities and the preferential concentration or clustering of the droplets. The radial relative velocities increased by up to 3 times the corresponding gravitational value and the greatest increase in the clustering, as measured by the radial distribution function, is 4.5 times the value for a random distribution as for the gravitational case. Parameterizations have been developed for the effect of turbulence on the radial relative velocities and the clustering of the droplets. These models reduce the average root-mean-squared errors in the existing velocity parameterization of Saffman and Turner and Wang et al. by 32% and the clustering parameterization of Zhou et al. by up to 58%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it