MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032470193 · doi:10.1080/15567030801929217

A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Power Generation Planning under Uncertainty

2008· article· en· W2032470193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicMathematical optimizationFuzzy logicStochastic programmingExtension (predicate logic)Computer scienceInteger programmingElectric power systemStability (learning theory)Dynamic programmingProgramming paradigmPower (physics)Operations researchReliability engineeringMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, an integrated fuzzy possibilistic-joint probabilistic mixed-integer programming (FPJPMIP) model is developed and applied to the expansion planning of power generation under uncertainty. As an extension of existing fuzzy possibilistic programming and joint probabilistic programming, the FPJPMIP addresses system uncertainties in the model's left- and right-hand sides (with the expression of possibilistic and probabilistic distributions). Its applicability has been demonstrated by the application to a hypothetic power generation problem. The developed method is applied to a case of power generation expansion planning, where desirable solutions are obtained. Willingness to pay higher costs will promise system stability. A desire to reduce the costs will get into the risk of potential system failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it