MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Behavior of Slender Steel-Concrete Composite Columns Wrapped with FRP Jackets

2011· article· en· W2032569671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticMaterials scienceComposite numberComposite materialBucklingCompressive strengthStructural engineeringStiffnessEpoxyDissipationGlass fiberEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the influence of slenderness on the behavior of steel-concrete composite columns encased in fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets. The composite columns are composed of steel I-sections that are partially encased by concrete and fully wrapped with epoxy-saturated glass and carbon FRP sheets. A total of nine specimens were tested with different slenderness parameters and heights ranging between 500 and 3,000 mm. The confining pressure provided by the FRP jacket and the composite action between the constituent materials resulted in an enhanced compressive behavior of the composite columns. The compressive strength, elastic axial stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity of the composite columns increased by a ratio of up to 5.2, 2.5, and 14.0, respectively, compared with that of the bare steel columns counterparts. A capacity curve, which shows the compressive strength of the composite columns for various slenderness parameters, was developed based on the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it