MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032602275 · doi:10.3917/lautr.041.0213

Autisme chez des enfants d'immigration récente : modèles explicatifs de familles originaires du Maghreb

2014· article· fr· W2032602275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueL Autre · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontfort Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude qualitative ethnographique documente les systèmes de croyance et les choix thérapeutiques de dix parents immigrants originaires du Maghreb et ayant un enfant diagnostiqué avec un trouble du spectre autistique au Québec. Des entrevues semi-structurées des parents et une observation participante lors de rencontres de soutien pour les mères ont été effectuées. Nos résultats montrent un tableau polysémique où coexistent des systèmes explicatifs biomédicaux, religieux et traditionnels. Ces différentes croyances influencent les choix thérapeutiques des parents qui font appel à la fois aux approches modernes communément acceptées au Canada et aux thérapies spirituelles ou traditionnelles acceptées au Maghreb. La religion joue un rôle particulièrement important dans l’acceptation de la condition de l’enfant. Une ouverture et un respect face aux croyances des parents et leurs choix thérapeutiques sont des éléments-clés pour faciliter l’alliance avec ces derniers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it