MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032841932 · doi:10.1002/lt.500060510

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and liver transplantation

2000· review· en· W2032841932 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLiver Transplantation · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLiver transplantationCardiomyopathyCirrhosisContractilityTransplantationInternal medicineHeart failurePathogenesisCardiologyDilated cardiomyopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myocardial contractility in cirrhosis is impaired, particularly under stressful situations, in a phenomenon termed cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Impairment of the cardiac beta-adrenergic receptor and its signaling function appears to be involved in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Additional mechanisms that may have a role include alterations in the physicochemical properties of the cardiomyocyte plasma membrane and abnormalities in circulating humoral factors, such as nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, and catecholamines. The widespread use of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and its associated stresses on the cardiovascular system have highlighted this condition. Cardiac failure has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the liver transplant recipient. Unfortunately, pre-OLT recognition of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is suboptimal because of a lack of sensitive, noninvasive diagnostic tests. Similarly, the management of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is largely empirical because of a paucity of existing literature. Although evidence suggests that cirrhotic cardiomyopathy may be reversible after OLT, the natural history of this condition warrants further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it