MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032898011 · doi:10.1109/acc.2012.6315672

Computation of empirical eigenfunctions of parabolic PDEs with time-varying domain

2012· article· en· W2032898011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationEigenfunctionComputer scienceDomain (mathematical analysis)Time domainApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisMathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we explore a methodology to compute the empirical eigenfunctions for the order-reduction of nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) system with time-varying domain. The idea behind this method is to obtain the mapping functional, which relates the time-evolution scalar physical property solution ensemble of the nonlinear parabolic PDE with the time-varying domain to a fixed reference domain, while preserving space invariant properties of the raw solution ensemble. Subsequently, the Karhunen-Lo'eve decomposition is applied to the solution ensemble with fixed spatial domain resulting in a set of optimal eigenfunctions that capture the most energy of data. Further, the low dimensional set of empirical eigenfunctions is mapped (“pushed-back”) on the time-varying domain by an appropriate mapping resulting in the basis for the construction of the reduced-order model of the parabolic PDEs with time-varying domain. Finally, this methodology is applied in the representative cases of calculation of empirical eigenfunctions in the case of one and two dimensional model of nonlinear reaction-diffusion parabolic PDE systems with analytically defined domain evolutions. In particular, the design of both mappings which relate the raw data and function spaces transformations from the time-varying to time-invariant domain are designed to preserve dynamic features of the scalar physical property and we provide comparisons among reduced and high order fidelity models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207