Valuing credit derivatives using Gaussian quadrature: A stochastic volatility framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article proposes semi‐closed‐form solutions to value derivatives on mean reverting assets. A very general mean reverting process for the state variable and two stochastic volatility processes, the square‐root process and the Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck process, are considered. For both models, semi‐closed‐form solutions for characteristic functions are derived and then inverted using the Gauss‐Laguerre quadrature rule to recover the cumulative probabilities. As benchmarks, European call options are valued within the following frameworks: Black and Scholes ( 1973 ) (represents constant volatility and no mean reversion), Longstaff and Schwartz ( 1995 ) (represents constant volatility and mean reversion), and Heston ( 1993 ) and Zhu ( 2000 ) (represent stochastic volatility and no mean reversion). These comparisons show that numerical prices converge rapidly to the exact price. When applied to the general models proposed (represent stochastic volatility and mean reversion), the Gauss‐Laguerre rule proves very efficient and very accurate. As applications, pricing formulas for credit spread options, caps, floors, and swaps are derived. It also is shown that even weak mean reversion can have a major impact on option prices. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 24:3–35, 2004
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".