Nonprofit Education: Course Offerings and Perceptions in Accredited U.S. Business Schools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given the continuing need for professional nonprofit managers, a trend toward more businesslike models for administrating nonprofits seems likely. However, the level of business school involvement in the education of future nonprofit managers is largely unknown. Given direction from the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB; the premier accreditation body for U.S. business schools) for an education that not only enhances a student's ability to contribute to an organization but to the greater society as well, it seems likely that an increased attention to a curricular focus on business educations that aids the training of future professional nonprofit organization managers might be likely. This study examines the status of nonprofit management, marketing, finance, accounting, social entrepreneurship, social marketing, fundraising courses, programs, and faculty in a sample of U.S. AACSB-accredited business schools. The perceptions of these business schools' leaders with regard to offering or not offering to participate in nonprofit management education are also explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it