MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033639196 · doi:10.2523/iptc-17162-ms

Spontaneous Imbibition of Water into Oil Saturated M_1 Bimodal Limestone

2013· article· en· W2033639196 on OpenAlexaff
Edward A. Clerke, James Funk, E. Shtepani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
FundersSaudi Aramco
KeywordsMacroporeImbibitionMicroporous materialPetrophysicsPorosityCarbonateMineralogyGeologySaturation (graph theory)Materials scienceCarbonate rockComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringChemistryMesoporous materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The M_1 nested bimodal pore system is prevalent in many large limestone oil reservoirs in Saudi Arabia. Within this pore system is contained a large portion of these fields' oil in place. Very low initial water saturation in these large structural relief carbonate reservoirs results in oil emplaced into pores controlled by M macropore throats and also into pores controlled by much smaller Type 1 micropore throats. Approximately, seventy-five percent of the M_1 oil portion is stored in the macropore system and about 25% is stored in the Type 1 micropore system. This prevalent M_1 petrophysical rock type (PRT) is an example of nested bimodal pore system consisting of an instance from the distribution of Macro possibilities (M porositon) and an instance from the Type 1 micro porositon distribution. The maximum pore-throat diameters of the Type 1 micro porositon are on the average 53 times smaller than the M macro porositon average maximums. M porosity average is 17% with a mean maximum pore-throat diameter of 58 microns. The Type 1 microporosity average is 5.6% with a mean maximum pore-throat diameter of 1.1 microns. Thus, common in Arab-D carbonate reservoir matrix is a bimodal pore network with a very large hydraulic contrast between a fine network of well-sorted tubular Type 1 micropore throats, connected and adjacent to a network of much larger diameter moderately-sorted M macropore throats. In a previous publication by Clerke, it was shown that the very small micropore throats' contribution to the total permeability is commonly below the resolution and reproducibility of the permeability measuring device when in the presence of many much larger pore throats. The micropore network is permeable if only at a small value. For the two phase flow occurring in a waterflood for oil recovery, the M_1 PRT requires an understanding of the two phase recovery processes in each pore subsystem considering capillarity in the combined pore network. This paper demonstrates that the Type 1 micropores are themselves a permeable network to water and to both oil and water when under waterflood. Hence for our carbonate reservoirs, "pores with throat diameters less than one micron when filled with oil in a bimodal M_1 pore system contribute to oil recovery through a time dependent spontaneous imbibition process and thereby contribute to oil recovery by waterflood." Further, it is demonstrated that the multimodality porositon classification proposed by Clerke are a form of dynamic rock type that classify the position and the type of internal pore level capillarity spatial gradients that affect ultimate oil recovery. New high-precision laboratory data has been obtained at very low phase pressure: water imbibition into oil saturated M_1 pore systems at near zero phase pressures (spontaneous imbibition) and dispersion of D2O into water filled M_1 pore systems. These pore systems can now be analyzed to obtain the magnitude, direct time dependence and scaling behavior of this important and previously overlooked portion of the total carbonate oil recovery by waterflood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207