Vestibular End-Organ Dysfunction in Children With Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Similarities between the peripheral auditory and vestibular systems suggest that children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) may demonstrate associated vestibular impairments. The current study examines vestibular function in a previously reported cohort (n = 40) augmented by 113 children with profound SNHL. METHODS: The current study is prospective and cross-sectional with repeated measures. Horizontal canal function was assessed in response to caloric and rotational stimuli. Saccular function was examined using vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). One hundred fifty-three children were tested; 119 had unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) at time of testing, and 34 were evaluated before CI. RESULTS: Horizontal semicircular canal function was abnormal in response to caloric stimuli in 50% (69/139), with a proportion (18/69, 26%) reflecting mild to moderate unilateral abnormalities. Severe hypofunction or areflexia occurred in 37% (51/139). Horizontal semicircular canal function in response to rotation was abnormal in 47% (64/139). Bilateral reduction in VOR gain was seen across frequencies in 29% (40/139) and 13% (18/139) demonstrated isolated high-frequency (≥ 2 Hz) loss. Saccular function was absent bilaterally in 21% (32/135) and unilaterally in 30% (40/135). All children with meningitis (n = 11) and 46% with radiologic cochleovestibular anomalies (n = 31) had horizontal canal dysfunction, whereas 45% and 46%, respectively, displayed saccular dysfunction. Unilateral dysfunction of the horizontal canal or the saccule was equally distributed between the implanted and nonimplanted ear (14:9 and 22:18, respectively), and the differences in proportions were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Vestibular end organ dysfunction occurred in half of all children with profound SNHL. Approximately one-third of the subjects displayed severe abnormalities(bilateral and/or severe loss). The likelihood of vestibular end-organ dysfunction is highly dependent on etiology, with meningitis and cochleovestibular anomalies having the highest rates of severe dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".