MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033844950 · doi:10.1159/000167248

Influence of Mannitol and Dopamine on Renal Function during Elective Infrarenal Aortic Clamping in Man

2008· article· en· W2033844950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Nephrology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionMannitolClampClampingExtracellular fluidDopamineRenal blood flowAnesthesiaAortic cross-clampInternal medicineUrologyCardiologyExtracellularChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of elective infrarenal aortic clamping on parameters of renal function was evaluated in 27 extracellular fluid volume expanded patients. Significant transient decreases (p less than 0.05) in glomerular filtration rate were observed in all three groups either in the early or late post-clamp release period, despite maintenance of hemodynamic stability. This study documents transient decreases in glomerular filtration rate which occurred following release of the infrarenal aortic cross-clamp. No clinically important benefit from the use of mannitol and dopamine over extracellular fluid volume expansion with saline alone was demonstrated in the prevention of the changes in renal function associated with aortic cross-clamping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it