MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033981420 · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181cec48e

Calcium Sulfates: What Is the Evidence?

2010· article· en· W2033981420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryCalcaneusCalciumDentistryComplicationProspective cohort studyTibiaRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcium sulphate has been used extensively as a bioabsorbable bone substitute for 90 years. Its advantages include its low cost, ready availability and unlimited supply, lack of donor site morbidity, use as a delivery vehicle for other compounds (especially antibiotics), inherent osteoconductive properties (based on a structure similar to bone), and its proven safety record. We sought to determine the evidence-based medical studies (prospective and/or randomized clinical trials) that support the use of calcium sulphate as a bioabsorbable bone substitute. At the present time, the majority of reports are basic science investigations, animal studies, and retrospective clinical reviews of varying degrees of quality. Multiple retrospective reviews reveal that calcium sulphate is an effective void-filler in contained bony defects such as metaphyseal voids after impacted fracture reduction (calcaneus, tibial plateau), simple bone cysts, or posttraumatic defects. Three case series examining the use of calcium sulphate in the treatment of bone nonunions revealed a significant failure rate, suggesting that this material, used in isolation, is not optimal to promote union in that setting. A low but consistent complication rate, specifically serous drainage from the wound as the calcium sulphate absorbs, has been reported. This complication is higher when the material is used in higher volumes (greater than 20 mL) or in subcutaneous bones (tibia, ulna). There is some Level I to II evidence (one randomized trial, one case-control study, one prospective cohort study) that antibiotic-impregnated bioabsorbable calcium sulphate has the potential to reduce the number of procedures and surgical morbidity associated with the surgical treatment of chronic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion while maintaining a high rate of infection eradication. Calcium sulphate remains an inexpensive, safe, reliable bone void filler that can also serve as a absorbable delivery vehicle for antibiotics or other compounds. Further high-quality randomized and prospective clinical trials are required to define the role of calcium sulphate in modern orthopaedics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it