MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034126900 · doi:10.1111/apt.12313

Meta‐analysis: peri‐operative anti‐ <scp>TNF</scp> α treatment and post‐operative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2013· review· en· W2034126900 on OpenAlexaff
Neeraj Narula, Dan Charleton, John K. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersAmerican Gastroenterological Association
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioInternal medicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseasePerioperativeMeta-analysisGastroenterologyConfidence intervalSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The impact of peri-operative use of TNFα antagonists on post-operative complications such as infection and wound healing is controversial. AIM: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of peri-operative use of TNFα antagonists on post-operative complications such as infection and wound healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A literature search identified studies that investigated post-operative outcomes in patients with IBD using TNFα antagonists. The primary outcome was the rate of post-operative infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included the rates of non-infectious complications and total complications. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 18 studies with 4659 participants were eligible for inclusion. Patients with IBD using preoperative anti-TNFα therapies had significant increases in post-operative infectious [OR 1.56 (95% CI, 1.09-2.24)], non-infectious [OR 1.57 (95% CI, 1.14-2.17)] and total complications [OR 1.73 (95% CI, 1.23-2.43)]. Studies limited to patients with Crohn's disease demonstrated a statistically significant increase in infectious (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.28-2.89) and total (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.69-2.84) complications, and a trend towards increase in non-infectious complications (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.94-3.17). Studies of patients with ulcerative colitis did not demonstrate significant increases in infectious (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.56-3.45), non-infectious (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68-2.85), or total complications (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.47). CONCLUSION: Anti-TNFα therapies appear to increase the risk of post-operative complications. The increase in risk is small, and may well reflect residual confounding rather than a true biological effect. Nevertheless, physicians should exercise caution when continuing biological therapies during the peri-operative period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.041
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlimentary Pharmacology & TherapeuticsSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207