MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034240217 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-832929

Histological Response to Interferon Alfa-Based Therapies in Hepatitis C

2004· review· en· W2034240217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Liver Disease · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibrosisLiver biopsyInternal medicineGastroenterologyInterferonMaintenance therapyHepatitis C virusHepatitis CBiopsyImmunologyPegylated interferonChronic hepatitisInflammationInterferon alfaPathologyAlpha interferonRibavirinVirusChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Histological response is defined as an improvement in the severity of liver inflammation with or without an improvement in fibrosis in patients following treatment for an acute or chronic liver disorder. Histological response occurs in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who have had a sustained virological response following treatment with interferon (IFN) therapy and in a percentage of nonresponders. Continuing IFN long term as maintenance therapy has been shown to prevent histological progression in patients who had both a marked decline in serum HCV RNA level during treatment and a histological response on repeat histological analysis. Prospective controlled trials are currently evaluating the benefits of low-dose maintenance therapy with pegylated IFN in HCV patients who have failed to achieve sustained virological response. In the future, the development of serum markers of fibrosis may allow for monitoring of hepatic fibrosis and histological response to therapy without the need to perform repeat liver biopsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it