MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NEURAL GENERALIZED PREDICTIVE CONTROL WITH REFERENCE CONTROL MODEL FOR AN INDUCTION MOTOR DRIVE

2008· article· en· W2034769836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Induction motorControl engineeringNonlinear systemControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper the authors present a new advanced control algorithm for speed and flux tracking of an induction motor. This algorithm, called neural networks generalized predictive control (NGPC), uses a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN) and generalized predictive control (GPC) technique. The later is traditionally used for systems characterized by a slow dynamics, as in industrial process control. The NGPC algorithm is based on the use of ANN as a nonlinear prediction model of the motor. This modelling technique is done by using I/O data with no need of additional information regarding the machine parameters. The outputs of the neural predictor are the future values of the controlled variables needed by the optimization procedure, which is achieved by minimizing a cost function with a reference control model using the Newton-Raphson optimization algorithm. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed control method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it