Neurological Outcome and Management of Pedicle Screws Misplaced Totally Within the Spinal Canal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This study reports 9 cases referred to our institution after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and pedicle screws misplaced totally within the spinal canal. OBJECTIVE: To assess the neurological outcome associated with pedicle screws misplaced totally within the spinal canal. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of neurological complications from misplaced pedicle screws might be under-reported, and optimal management of pedicle screws misplaced totally within the spinal canal remains unclear. METHODS: Nine cases with pedicle screws misplaced totally within the spinal canal during posterior surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. All cases presented at least 1 medially misplaced pedicle screw, with spinal canal intrusion greater than pedicle screw diameter, that is, completely within the spinal canal. Percentage of spinal canal intrusion was measured from computed tomographic scans. RESULTS: Spinal canal intrusion varied from 21% to 61%. In 2 patients, misplacement of pedicle screws was recognized intraoperatively and all implants were removed. They both had motor deficits from which 1 patient recovered completely. Two patients had early postoperative postural headache that disappeared after removal of the misplaced screw. Five patients had uneventful early postoperative course. One of these developed a Brown-Sequard syndrome 2 years after surgery and underwent complete implant removal. Another patient developed left thoracic paresthesia 3 years after surgery, and complete implant removal was performed. Two neurologically intact patients had uneventful implant removal after infection. The last patient refused implant removal and remained asymptomatic 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Improper pedicle screw placement can lead to neurological complications appearing early or late (after 2 yr). Late neurological complications were associated with screw loosening in 2 cases. The authors strongly recommend removal of any pedicle screw misplaced totally within the spinal canal due to the risk of early or late neurological complications, regardless of the severity of spinal canal intrusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".