MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035033947 · doi:10.3137/ao.440103

Seasonal and Interannual Variability in the Circulation of Puget Sound, Washington: A Box Model Study

2006· article· en· W2035033947 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amanda Babson, M. Kawase, Parker MacCready

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyWashington State University
KeywordsHindcastSound (geography)Structural basinSalinityForcing (mathematics)ClimatologyEnvironmental scienceOceanographyDrainage basinBox modelTemperature salinity diagramsGeologyResidence time (fluid dynamics)SeasonalityGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A prognostic, time‐dependent box model of circulation in Puget Sound, Washington is used to study seasonal and interannual variations in residence times and interbasin transports. The model is capable of reproducing salinity variability in the Sound at seasonal timescales, and is shown to have hindcast skill at interannual timescales. Modelled transports vary as much between years as between seasons. The largest seasonal feature is a sharp transport drop in late autumn into the deep Main Basin of the Sound, which is shown to be caused by increased river flow into Whidbey Basin. The high degree of transport variability leads to large interannual differences in residence times; for instance, for Whidbey Basin the residence time varies from 33 to 44 days in the period between 1992 and 2001 and for southern Hood Canal it varies from 64 to 121 days. This indicates that residence time estimates based on a year or less of data may not yield representative values. A forcing sensitivity study shows that in all basins except the South Sound, salinity variability in the Strait of Juan de Fuca accounts for more of the seasonal variability than river variability does. However, year‐to‐year variability in river discharge affects interannual variability in transports as much as the Strait of Juan de Fuca salinity does. The model demonstrates poorest skill in the basins most affected by the Strait of Juan de Fuca salinity, indicating that the sparse data available for the Strait may not provide adequate boundary conditions for the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207