MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035050291 · doi:10.1177/0361684315573244

Starting “Real” Life

2015· article· en· W2035050291 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychology of Women Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsDepictionNormativeIdentity (music)PsychologyTransformative learningGender studiesLife course approachSpace (punctuation)Developmental psychologySociologySocial psychologyAestheticsEpistemologyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous research has argued that despite the historically shifting meanings of singleness and family relationships, the “single woman” remains a “deficit identity.” We wondered whether this is the case for women who are at a point in their lives when meeting the married-with-family standard is becoming less probable. Interviews were conducted with 12 women (ages 35–44) who lived in Western Canada and identified as “never married,” “non-mother,” and “midlife.” Data were analysed using discourse analysis. Participants negotiated a space where being single is constructed as normal, while at the same time answering to normative discourses of womanhood. They resisted the deficit identity of singleness by drawing on the “transformative midlife” interpretative repertoire, which constructed midlife as a time of creating a secure, independent life. In doing so, they positioned themselves as “comfortably single at midlife women,” an identity defined in terms of who the woman is. Our analysis offers a depiction of midlife as a continuous struggle to create and maintain this space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it